|
Post by uncleadrian on Sept 30, 2014 2:04:57 GMT -6
I see the wisdom in using unused resources. It would be a legal mess though. And it's easy to think, well just give them the damn houses. But in order to do that the government would have to seize them from who ever did own them, bank or not. Perhaps if the government made it easy to just dump the houses so the banks could claim a nice tax loss. Then it might work.
Back on topic.
A large majority of our nations homeless are mentaly ill, and I don't know if you could teach these people. imho.
Slightly off topic. I know a few people that were survivalists that got hit hard by the recession and lost their homes. They managed to get back on their feet using their preps. There are some pretty impressive stories out there about homeless survivalists living off their supplies out of their truck trying to make good again. Crafty people, to say the least. I remember one guy would park his truck in a different suburban neighborhood everynight and never got harassed by the fuzz. Cooking during the day when most people are at work and using fast food joints to clean up in the bathrooms and their free wifi to search for jobs.
|
|
odorf
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by odorf on Sept 30, 2014 5:40:35 GMT -6
mental health care, where do you draw the line on that? is he crazy or lazy? is a learning disability considered "mental" me thinks, in order to receive any help, [snap,welfare, shelter] not only should a background ck for felony convictions and drug screen be done, but an IQ test also} a evaluation needs to be done to weed out crazy from lazy As you can see, i have no pity for felons, druggies, or lazy ass folks.
i am a little hesitant to pick on convicted felons, simply because there are a lot of goober heads that took a plea when innocent, because of the simple fact they wanted out of jail, taking a plea was an easy out. due to no bail money and no money for a lawyer.
case in point, the lady in Georgia? who was arrested for dope residue on a spoon in her car thrown in jail, the "wheels of justice" were set in motion, she spent 6 mths in jail was about to accept a guilty plea bargain. when the lab came back with the test results on the residue spaghettiOs
|
|
|
Post by uncleadrian on Sept 30, 2014 5:45:05 GMT -6
Never heard of that one. Sounds about right though. Have a link to the story?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using proboards
|
|
|
Post by fredfredfred on Sept 30, 2014 5:48:38 GMT -6
If they are crazy why aren't they in a mental institution ?
|
|
|
Post by ihatedhollis on Sept 30, 2014 9:39:19 GMT -6
OK, so it is better to pay the city to tear down the houses and add to the landfills. They are already getting assistance, why not let them earn their own property. The houses are practically worthless in their current state. By giving them an opportunity to earn a house, perhaps the pride of ownership will give them the incentive to keep it in good repair. A rising tide raises all ships.
|
|
odorf
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by odorf on Sept 30, 2014 17:14:06 GMT -6
linkMeth charge dropped after only spaghetti sauce found on spoon Commerce woman released after lab analysis backs her SpaghettiOs claim By Nick Watson nwatson@gainesvilletimes.com POSTED: September 19, 2014 9:25 p.m. Drug charges have been dropped against a Commerce woman after crime lab analysis confirmed her claim that a spoon she had in a vehicle leading to her arrest did not contain methamphetamine residue but spaghetti sauce. Ashley Gabrielle Huff, 23, initially was charged with possession of methamphetamine. She maintained the residue on a spoon was spaghetti sauce, not meth. After the analysis agreed, the charge was dismissed. She was released from the Hall County Jail on Thursday night. “I think she said it had been SpaghettiOs,” Hall County assistant public defender Chris van Rossem said. Huff was arrested July 2 by the Gainesville Police Department, suspected of having meth residue on a spoon, van Rossem said. “From what I understand, she was a passenger in a car and had a spoon on her, near her, and I guess the officer, for whatever reason, thought there was some residue,” he said. According to the Hall County Comprehensive Justice Information System, Huff had not been charged with any type of felony or drug-related offense prior to the incident. “She’s maintained all along that there’s no way in hell that’s any sort of drug residue or anything like that,” van Rossem said. Attempts to obtain the original arrest report from the Gainesville Police were unsuccessful, and van Rossem was unfamiliar with other details related to the arrest. Gainesville Police spokesman Cpl. Kevin Holbrook said the department would defer to the district attorney’s office. Van Rossem, who was assigned Aug. 11 to Huff, began the process of a plea deal. The district attorney’s office filed a dismissal Thursday following the crime lab’s analysis. “The Crime Lab report showed no controlled substances on the spoon submitted for testing,” according to a dismissal signed by Northeastern Judicial Circuit District Attorney Lee Darragh. Huff originally attempted going through the Hall County Drug Court but wasn’t able to make all the appointments, van Rossem said. Huff was then reincarcerated Aug. 2 and was unable to make the bond payment, he said. “I think what the unfortunate part about her case is that she was probably willing to take the felony to close out her case so that she get out of jail, even though she always maintained innocence,” van Rossem said. Attempts to reach Huff through her public defender were unsuccessful. Meth charge dropped after only spaghetti sauce found on spoon Commerce woman released after lab analysis backs her SpaghettiOs claim By Nick Watson nwatson@gainesvilletimes.com POSTED: September 19, 2014 9:25 p.m. Drug charges have been dropped against a Commerce woman after crime lab analysis confirmed her claim that a spoon she had in a vehicle leading to her arrest did not contain methamphetamine residue but spaghetti sauce. Ashley Gabrielle Huff, 23, initially was charged with possession of methamphetamine. She maintained the residue on a spoon was spaghetti sauce, not meth. After the analysis agreed, the charge was dismissed. She was released from the Hall County Jail on Thursday night. “I think she said it had been SpaghettiOs,” Hall County assistant public defender Chris van Rossem said. Huff was arrested July 2 by the Gainesville Police Department, suspected of having meth residue on a spoon, van Rossem said. “From what I understand, she was a passenger in a car and had a spoon on her, near her, and I guess the officer, for whatever reason, thought there was some residue,” he said. According to the Hall County Comprehensive Justice Information System, Huff had not been charged with any type of felony or drug-related offense prior to the incident. “She’s maintained all along that there’s no way in hell that’s any sort of drug residue or anything like that,” van Rossem said. Attempts to obtain the original arrest report from the Gainesville Police were unsuccessful, and van Rossem was unfamiliar with other details related to the arrest. Gainesville Police spokesman Cpl. Kevin Holbrook said the department would defer to the district attorney’s office. Van Rossem, who was assigned Aug. 11 to Huff, began the process of a plea deal. The district attorney’s office filed a dismissal Thursday following the crime lab’s analysis. “The Crime Lab report showed no controlled substances on the spoon submitted for testing,” according to a dismissal signed by Northeastern Judicial Circuit District Attorney Lee Darragh. Huff originally attempted going through the Hall County Drug Court but wasn’t able to make all the appointments, van Rossem said. Huff was then reincarcerated Aug. 2 and was unable to make the bond payment, he said. “I think what the unfortunate part about her case is that she was probably willing to take the felony to close out her case so that she get out of jail, even though she always maintained innocence,” van Rossem said. Attempts to reach Huff through her public defender were unsuccessful.
|
|
odorf
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by odorf on Sept 30, 2014 17:36:35 GMT -6
OK, so it is better to pay the city to tear down the houses and add to the landfills. They are already getting assistance, why not let them earn their own property. The houses are practically worthless in their current state. By giving them an opportunity to earn a house, perhaps the pride of ownership will give them the incentive to keep it in good repair. A rising tide raises all ships. who is going to pay, [to the owner of the property} compensation for his/her land? you just cant give some elses property away cause you want to as long as the owner is paying his taxs, that is his land not to be argumentative, but, lets look at this with an open mind you have a homeless guy, no job, no skills, no nothing. you put him into a condemed/tore al to hell house with the copper pipes tore out, no heat, no lights, no wireing no appliances you tell him he can have the house if he fixes it up. do you have any idea the expense to rehab a house in the condition those crack houses are in? thousands, on the cheap side, you are looking at 20 to 30 grand where is he to get the money for materials? tools? knowledge? who will pay the licensed contractors to install the elec and hvac and plumbing? your idea sounds like a noble and compassionate idea. but it wonk work. not only are you wanting to pay for food, now you want to give each hommie 30 grand and pay utilites plus...compensation to the orginal land owner. your into EACH homeless person for upwards of 50k EACH
|
|
|
Post by fastback65 on Oct 1, 2014 11:12:17 GMT -6
The city of Jackson has taken a lot of abandoned property over the years without compensation, so , actually they can take someone's property without paying for it. There is also a lot ot property seized for failure to pay taxes. An enterprising person can find the necessary materials to make the house livable. The point you are not getting is, we are already giving them money. We give them money in the form of subsidized housing, free health care and free groceries. We subsidize their utilities and their are private donations of food and clothing. The only difference is,, they would actually own something. The lack of pride in ownership is, at least, partially responsible for their current state. I agree with ihatedhollis, it is worth a trial program. There are countless school kids looking for something to do in the summer, maybe the city could pay them a minimal amount to help rehab some of there properties.
|
|
odorf
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by odorf on Oct 1, 2014 17:54:10 GMT -6
who will pay the 30k for materials per house...and thats a conservative estimenate point you are not getting is. you cant just make materials appear. and the plumbing, elec, hvac, has to be done by a licensed pro. who will pay?
giving to the poor is all well and good, but you keep saying we gonna feed them anyway now, so take that money towards this other you are still left with the original bill to pay i am all in favor of your plan, IF you can find the money..and PLEASE do not say you will redirect the money already earmarked. its earmarked for a reason
i'll tell you where to get the money. stop paying aid to foreign countries and spend THAT money on your project here at home
|
|
|
Post by ihatedhollis on Oct 9, 2014 17:46:01 GMT -6
Here's What Happened When One City Gave Homeless People Shelter Instead of Throwing Them in Jail While many cities continue to criminalize the homeless population, one city tried giving them homes. October 8, 2014 | Kilee Lowe was sitting in a park when cops picked her up and booked her into jail overnight. After she got out the next morning, she returned to the park. The same officer who had thrown her into a cell not 24 hours before booked her again. It was back to jail for Kilee. Kilee has been cycling in and out of the criminal justice system for years. After three and a half years in federal prison, she’s been homeless for a little over a year now. “Just because I don’t have a credit card in my pocket,” she says, “does not make me a criminal.” Kilee lives in one of hundreds of American cities that have criminalized homelessness. Sometimes the “crime” is loitering. Sometimes it’s panhandling. In 2014 alone, one hundred American cities have banned sitting or lying down in public places. Wherever it happens, the fallout is frustratingly similar. Not having a roof over your head means living in a continual crisis. The stress of not knowing where you’ll sleep at night, whether your family will be safe, and if you’ll be able to eat can suck up all your energy and your will. Regular stints in jail can only make it more difficult to find stability. Not only that, but they drain tax dollars that could be put to much better use. Salt Lake City crunched the numbers. And the prescription was clear. The city was spending $20,000 per homeless resident per year – funding for policing, arrests, jail time, shelter, and emergency services. Homelessness was not going down. Instead, for $7,800 a year through a new program called Housing First, the city could provide a person with an apartment and case management services. In 2005, the city was spending $40 million to address chronic homelessness. Several years after starting the Housing First program, in 2013, spending was down to $9.6 million. And more importantly, chronic homelessness has dropped 72 percent. In a new video (above), Brave New Films and The Nation spoke to people whose lives have been greatly improved by the Housing First program. One man says that homeless people are often homeless because they are running from problems. Sometimes it’s abuse. Sometimes it’s addiction. He had been molested as a child and struggled with drug addiction as an adult. Recovery was hard and other programs would throw him back on the street if he relapsed, continuing the destructive cycle. After moving into stable housing, the unending stress of being homeless has dissolved. He’s been able to focus on sobriety and recovering. It’s worked. For the last forty years, this country has continually ratcheted up the number of people behind bars and expanded the reasons we put them there. Social problems – like homelessness, drug addiction, and mental illness – have been sucked into a criminal justice system ill equipped to handle them. The problems haven’t been solved. Instead, we’ve locked too many people away and wasted money that could have been spent on interventions that could actually change the course of people’s lives. And as has always been the case with excessive correctional control, communities of color have been hardest hit. But it doesn’t have to be this way. America can safely reduce our reliance on incarceration—several states have reduced their prison populations while crime rates have dropped. Salt Lake City’s Housing First program is an important step in the right direction, a much more humane and fiscally responsible approach than criminalization. Other cities should follow suit. It’s time to end mass criminalization. www.alternet.org/civil-libert...-throwing-them
|
|
odorf
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by odorf on Oct 12, 2014 12:17:57 GMT -6
do you see what is happening in colorado because of the free pot program? homeless people are coming from all over. its just like at a pig trough, you ring the bell they all come running
you start giving away free houses and every homeless person in that state will gravitate to that town to get "his"
sorry man, I do not believe in the demorat agenda of cradle to grave support. I dont care how you wrap it up and how many bows you put on it. its still giving away to the poor my tax dollars i am working for
i want less gov. less taxs not more
the lazy bastards need to get off there dead ass's and get a job'
years back, due to my own fault. i lost my job. living paycheck to paycheck, paying rent by the week' i was out on my ass. i took me 3 weeks, sleeping anywhere i could, taking baths at hose pipe. i got a lower than min wage, wet back job loading 5 lb bags of rice hull ash into 18 wheelers. back breaking work for no money. i slept behind the building. when i was not working, i was looking for work. i talked to a carpenter told him i will work for free.just give me a chance. if i work good pay me, if not, run me off if payed me, kept me on, I WAS WILLING TO WORK FREE to prove myself you gotta do what you gotta do.
long story short. they are homeless because they choose to be, if they wanted to work, they could find work i will help those that help them selves, i will not help a lazy ass lay around
|
|
|
Post by ihatedhollis on Oct 13, 2014 8:06:38 GMT -6
they are homeless because they choose to be, if they wanted to work, they could find work i will help those that help them selves, i will not help a lazy ass lay around Did you choose to be homeless? Did you not read where the city SAVED money. I did NOT cost them more. Your statement that they are homeless because they want to be is a very classless thing to say. Sure some are, but some are victims of circumstances. A mother and her children do not take to the streets because they want to. I am not sure what giving away pot has to do with this discussion. I have nothing further to say on the subject other than we have tried it your way for years with no good result, maybe it's time to try something else.
|
|
odorf
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by odorf on Oct 14, 2014 10:48:36 GMT -6
yes, i read your post. it is flawed. your savings is based on money saved by "$20,000 per homeless resident per year – funding for policing, arrests, jail time, shelter, and emergency services". that is "assuming" each homeless person is using those services. your figures are inflated I went to this site looking for ammo to blast you with. am surprised the return rate to the streets is only 23% sounds high, but actually is not your figures are still inflated, . hell man, go to a meeting down town. be the first on your block to spear head the campaign
|
|
|
Post by fastback65 on Oct 15, 2014 10:21:56 GMT -6
Why didn't you answer the question? Did you choose to be homeless? By the way, those are not my figures, the figures are from the city of Salt Lake. If we can't trust the Mormons, who can we trust. Your 23% figure is skewed because it only addresses chronically homeless that are alcoholics. Contrary to your belief, not all homeless are drug abusers or alcoholics. Were you an alcholic when you were homeless? How about drugs?
|
|